Eradications and conflict in Colombia
- Opinión
While the coca farmer is treated as a criminal the road to peace in the Colombian countryside will remain closed.
Although more and more coca is being eradicated, production levels remain steady. According to the latest Annual Report of the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), published in March 2008, more and more coca is being eradicated in
When programmes to eradicate illicit crops do not take place gradually, as part of a framework of consensus involving farming communities, they are condemned to failure, as decades of forced eradication in
Since 2002, under the auspices of the German Government and the UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime), a series of thematic conferences have taken place with the aim of evaluating 25 years of alternative development, and drawing conclusions about the future. According to the final declaration of the first of these conferences, “Alternative Development should neither be made conditional to a prior elimination of drug crop cultivation nor should a reduction be enforced until licit components of livelihoods strategies have been sufficiently strengthened.”[2]
In the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs March 2008 session, which took place in
The International Crisis Group, in its last report on drugs in
In the case of a country like
Forced eradications in
Between a rock and a hard place
As a result of the drugs policy applied in
Although the great marches of the coca farmers that took place in the South of Colombia in the 1990s now give the appearance of being in the past, in reality smaller versions of these protests continue to take place. The most recent case was last February, when thousands of farmers and their families from the Valdivia and Bajo Cauca regions of the department of Antioquia protested. The protest started when the farmers took two schools and the main square of the
The eradications have not only taken place in Antioquia. As anticipated, in 2008 anti-narcotics authorities began eradicating more widely in a total of 22 of
The anti-drugs policy applied in
The Colombian conflict, which has been developing for more than four decades, has become linked to the existence of illicit coca crops and the development and expansion of a coca economy. Any perspective aiming to find ways to solve the Colombian armed conflict – and it is worth mentioning here that this persists not only because of violence from the guerillas, but also that of the different paramilitary groups linked to drugs trafficking and other businesses operating on the margins of legality, as well as the interaction between these groups and members of the armed forces – should start with a substantial change in the strategy currently being applied in Colombia to dealing with the illicit crops.
Meanwhile, the Colombian authorities should not criminalise the coca farmers’ protests with the argument that the FARC are behind them. The government would do better to take the complaints of the communities seriously and recognise that its eradication policy is not working. It has not reduced the crops, but it has created social problems. The aerial crop sprayings with glyphosate are not effective against the coca plant. On the other hand, they do affect subsistence food crops, water sources, the health of the local population and the environment.
Eradication, a practice questioned even by government and international bodies (as shown above), has not successfully prevented re-sowing. In this sense, it would be highly advantageous for the government to implement aid plans for farmers in coca growing areas. These should take the form of alternative sustainable development programmes that take into account the suitability of the land where they are being applied and the interests of the participating communities. They should provide a more equitable redistribution of land – especially land seized from the large drug traffickers – and the return to the communities of lands that they have lost in the past decade, due to expropriations by armed groups and drugs traffickers.
From the beginning of Plan
Translated from Spanish by Kate Wilson
References
(1) E/CN.7/2008/2/Add.2,Session 51 of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, United Nations Fifth Report of the Executive Director on the world drug problem, Action Plan on International Cooperation on the Eradication of Illicit Drug Crops and of Altrnative Development, Vienna, 10th to 14th March 2008.
International Crisis Group, Latin American Drugs I: losing the fight, Latin America Report No.25, 14th March, 2008.
International Crisis Group, Latin American Drugs II: improving policy and reducing harm, Latin America Report No.26, 14th March, 2008.
International Narcotics Control Board INCB, 2007 report. United Nations,
Source: www.tni.org
[1] The quantity has not yet been officially established.
[2] Feldafing Declaration, http://www.unodc.un.or.th/ad/feldafing/document/declaration.pdf
[3] E/CN.7/2008/2/Add.2, Fifth Report of the Executive Director on the world drug problem, Action Plan on International Cooperation on the Eradication of Illicit Drug Crops and of Altrnative Development,
[4] International Crisis Group, Latin American Drugs I: losing the fight, Latin America Report No.25, 14th March, 2008.
[5] On the protest in
[6] El Tiempo, En tres meses se erradicaron
[7] Lluvia de glifosato [Glyphosate Rain], El Espectador, Bogotá, 24th November 2007
[8] According to UN statistics, in 1996
Del mismo autor
- Una creciente disensión 10/05/2012
- Eradications and conflict in Colombia 19/05/2008
- Erradicación y conflicto 19/05/2008