WSF 2003
Confronting the Empire
27/01/2003
- Opinión
We are meeting at a moment of world history that is in many ways unique – a
moment that is ominous, but also full of hope.
The most powerful state in history has proclaimed, loud and clear, that it
intends to rule the world by force, the dimension in which it reigns supreme.
Apart from the conventional bow to noble intentions that is the standard (hence
meaningless) accompaniment of coercion, its leaders are committed to pursuit of
their "imperial ambition," as it is frankly described in the leading journal of
the foreign policy establishment – critically, an important matter. They have
also declared that they will tolerate no competitors, now or in the future.
They evidently believe that the means of violence in their hands are so
extraordinary that they can dismiss with contempt anyone who stands in their
way. There is good reason to believe that the war with Iraq is intended, in
part, to teach the world some lessons about what lies ahead when the empire
decides to strike a blow -- though "war" is hardly the proper term, given the
array of forces.
The doctrine is not entirely new, nor unique to the US, but it has never before
been proclaimed with such brazen arrogance – at least not by anyone we would
care to remember.
I am not going to try to answer the question posed for this meeting: How to
confront the empire. The reason is that most of you know the answers as well or
better than I do, through your own lives and work. The way to "confront the
empire" is to create a different world, one that is not based on violence and
subjugation, hate and fear. That is why we are here, and the WSF offers hope
that these are not idle dreams.
Yesterday I had the rare privilege of seeing some very inspiring work to achieve
these goals, at the international gathering of the Via Campesina at a community
of the MST, which I think is the most important and exciting popular movement in
the world. With constructive local actions such as those of the MST, and
international organization of the kind illustrated by the Via Campesina and the
WSF, with sympathy and solidarity and mutual aid, there is real hope for a
decent future.
I have also had some other recent experiences that give a vivid picture of what
the world may be like if imperial violence is not limited and dismantled. Last
month I was in southeastern Turkey, the scene of some of the worst atrocities of
the grisly 1990s, still continuing: just a few hours ago we were informed of
renewed atrocities by the army near Diyarbakir, the unofficial capital of the
Kurdish regions. Through the 1990s, millions of people were driven out of the
devastated countryside, with tens of thousands killed and every imaginable form
of barbaric torture. They try to survive in caves outside the walls of
Diyarbakir, in condemned buildings in miserable slums in Istanbul, or wherever
they can find refuge, barred from returning to their villages despite new
legislation that theoretically permits return. 80% of the weapons came from the
US. In the year 1997 alone, Clinton sent more arms to Turkey than in the entire
Cold War period combined up to the onset of the state terror campaign – called
"counterterror" by the perpetrators and their supporters, another convention.
Turkey became the leading recipient of US arms as atrocities peaked (apart from
Israel-Egypt, a separate category).
In 1999, Turkey relinquished this position to Colombia. The reason is that in
Turkey, US-backed state terror had largely succeeded, while in Colombia it had
not. Colombia had the worst human rights record in the Western hemisphere in
the 1990s and was by far the leading recipient of US arms and military training,
and now leads the world. It also leads the world by other measures, for
example, murder of labor activists: more than half of those killed worldwide in
the last decade were in Colombia. Close to ½ million people were driven from
their land last year, a new record. The displaced population is now estimated
at 2.7 million. Political killings have risen to 20 a day; 5 years ago it was
half that.
I visited Cauca in southern Colombia, which had the worst human rights record in
the country in 2001, quite an achievement. There I listened to hours of
testimony by peasants who were driven from their lands by chemical warfare –
called "fumigation" under the pretext of a US-run "drug war" that few take
seriously and that would be obscene if that were the intent. Their lives and
lands are destroyed, children are dying, they suffer from sickness and wounds.
Peasant agriculture is based on a rich tradition of knowledge and experience
gained over many centuries, in much of the world passed on from mother to
daughter. Though a remarkable human achievement, it is very fragile, and can be
destroyed forever in a single generation. Also being destroyed is some of the
richest biodiversity in the world, similar to neighboring regions of Brazil.
Campesinos, indigenous people, Afro-Colombians can join the millions in rotting
slums and camps. With the people gone, multinationals can come in to strip the
mountains for coal and to extract oil and other resources, and to convert what
is left of the land to monocrop agroexport using laboratory-produced seeds in an
environment shorn of its treasures and variety.
The scenes in Cauca and Southeastern Turkey are very different from the
celebrations of the Via Campesina gathering at the MST community. But Turkey
and Colombia are inspiring and hopeful in different ways, because of the courage
and dedication of people struggling for justice and freedom, confronting the
empire where it is killing and destroying.
These are some of the signs of the future if "imperial ambition" proceeds on its
normal course, now to be accelerated by the grand strategy of global rule by
force. None of this is inevitable, and among the good models for ending these
crimes are the ones I mentioned: the MST, the Via Campesina, and the WSF.
At the WSF, the range of issues and problems under intense discussion is very
broad, remarkably so, but I think we can identify two main themes. One is
global justice and Life after Capitalism – or to put it more simply, life,
because it is not so clear that the human species can survive very long under
existing state capitalist institutions. The second theme is related: war and
peace, and more specifically, the war in Iraq that Washington and London are
desperately seeking to carry out, virtually alone.
Let's start with some good news about these basic themes. As you know, there is
also a conference of the World Economic Forum going on right now, in Davos.
Here in Porto Alegre, the mood is hopeful, vigorous, exciting. In Davos, the
New York Times tells us, "the mood has darkened." For the "movers and shakers,"
it is not "global party time" any more. In fact, the founder of the Forum has
conceded defeat: "The power of corporations has completely disappeared," he
said. So we have won. There is nothing left for us to do but pick up the
pieces -- not only to talk about a vision of the future that is just and humane,
but to move on to create it.
Of course, we should not let the praise go to our heads. There are still a few
difficulties ahead.
The main theme of the WEF is "Building Trust." There is a reason for that. The
"masters of the universe," as they liked to call themselves in more exuberant
days, know that they are in serious trouble. They recently released a poll
showing that trust in leaders has severely declined. Only the leaders of NGOs
had the trust of a clear majority, followed by UN and spiritual/religious
leaders, then leaders of Western Europe and economic managers, below them
corporate executives, and well below them, at the bottom, leaders of the US,
with about 25% trust. That may well mean virtually no trust: when people are
asked whether they trust leaders with power, they usually say "Yes," out of
habit.
It gets worse. A few days ago a poll in Canada found that over 1/3 of the
population regard the US as the greatest threat to world peace. The US ranks
more than twice as high as Iraq or North Korea, and far higher than al-Qaeda as
well. A poll without careful controls, by Time magazine, found that over 80% of
respondents in Europe regarded the US as the greatest threat to world peace,
compared with less than 10% for Iraq or North Korea. Even if these numbers are
wrong by some substantial factor, they are dramatic.
Without going on, the corporate leaders who paid $30,000 to attend the somber
meetings in Davos have good reasons to take as their theme: "Building Trust."
The coming war with Iraq is undoubtedly contributing to these interesting and
important developments. Opposition to the war is completely without historical
precedent. In Europe it is so high that Secretary of "Defense" Donald Rumsfeld
dismissed Germany and France as just the "°âèØöë
https://www.alainet.org/pt/node/106893
Del mismo autor
- The path to a livable future, or will rich corporations trash the planet? 28/10/2021
- A sociedade global pós-pandemia 05/02/2021
- Three major threats the world must address in 2021 08/01/2021
- As três maiores ameaças à vida na Terra que devemos abordar em 2021 08/01/2021
- Tres grandes amenazas a la vida en la Tierra que debemos afrontar en 2021 08/01/2021
- Internationalisme ou extinction 21/09/2020
- Internacionalismo o Extinción 21/09/2020
- Internacionalismo ou Extinção 21/09/2020
- Internationalism or Extinction 21/09/2020
- Chomsky: A escassez de respiradores expõe a crueldade do capitalismo neoliberal 06/04/2020